# posted by Brancibeer @ 4/20/2005 08:18:00 AM
I look at the time on the out-of-focus projected screen. 2pm. Only 3 more hours of sitting through this meeting then I can head home. I’m at a expert workshop that will take part in defining the future conservation priorities for the state of Florida for the next 10 years. You would think I would want to be here. In a way I do though. I think back to being completely unappreciated at my old jobs, and realize that now I'm actually in somewhat of a position where I matter. This is what I wanted.
I didn’t really belong there anyway. I’m no expert on marine systems. I gave my presentation about my job early in the morning, now I’ve just had to sit through the rest. I find some things interesting and pay attention at times. Others are not so. Mostly just people talking to be heard. Everyone’s trying to sound intelligent. I speak up about a few actions to take toward global climate change, for that’s something I can contribute too. “What can Florida do?”, I say. “Its not Florida, it’s the nation, even the world”. Everyone agrees because I state something that’s probably already on everyone's mind. Some side conversations sprout out about the “current administration” and how much it sucks for the environment. I feel a sense of belonging with the other participants in the room. Its warming and hopeful. We are one in ideals. Then a minute later the feeling of helplessness creeps in and we all realize theres nothing we really can do and that warm feeling is replaced by actuality. Climate change is too big of an issue for a group of 12 people in one state. Even if Florida did everything perfect, it wouldn’t even dent the problem. Our talk turns to more retroactive discussion about preventive measures. More like bracing for the storm.
Coastal development is another issue. Some joke about population control. Our tasks seem impossible at times but we struggle through it. County ordinances, landowner incentives, public education - we suggest, but we all know we are fighting an uphill battle. 95% of the population doesn’t think like we do. They don’t care or even want to know the truth of their actions. Staying positive in this field is as hard as finding solutions to it. Hope dives in and out of reality. 2 more hours to go. I get up and grab another piece of cake and some coffee. The only time I ever drink coffee is at these damn meetings. The stimulant in my body gives me an easy feeling and I try to think hard about the issues. Ok, we need practical solutions and strategies. “Well, how about tying climate change into other well known issues. For instance every time gas prices shoot up to $ 1.20 something you hear all this talk on the radio or tv about sustainability and renewable energy. Its all the same thing. If we can get the people to realize its all the same issues (i.e.- climate change is caused by green house gasses which is created from emissions, which is created from buring gas). Promoting renewable energy will avert many problems at once. It just gives us more ammo to shoot at the people”. An older lady across the table smiles a nice smile at me, and the conversation moves on. I didn’t really get my point across, but I said something, and that’s good enough for me. At this point in my career I'm still getting used to talking at meetings. I lose myself when I start to talk, and do not convey my thoughts clearly. Frustrating, but understandable, I’m the youngest person in the room by far. “What we are really talking about here is public education”, the facilitator clarifies. Yup, we have to get the public to care more. Another thought passes through my head but this time I do not voice it. What we really need is to change the politics by changing the legislation. And that’s done by voting- again back to the public. The caffeine begins to wear off and I drift a little out of it. How do you get people to care? And more importantly- how do you get people to care, before its too late? Five o’clock, time to drive the 2 hours home. I’m skipping out of the meeting a day early. I gave my presentation, I'm no longer needed. Now on to more urgent issues, what’s for dinner? I think about irony on the road home.
keep at it bud, the public/semipublic speaking will come. it was hard, in classes of 80 here to participate at first cuz you dont want to sound like an ass. but it gets easier. every little time helps. and the more you say, perhaps the more people will listen.
i heard an interesting theory the other night: that the majority of america is really in the independents, but that they are lost because independents generally don't have a strong platform as a party and dont voice their opinions as much, and that's why america seems so polarized. and maybe these people dont vote. further, democrats need to stop being so damn reactive, and must start being proactive. face it, you're not going to win an election when the only platform people recognize is that you're anti-republican. one thing republicans have is a clear platform: our religion is the right one and we're going to use it to decide morals and rule you. this is horrible, but a simple reactionary plan won't help either. that's why we need voices, and new opinions. start a conversation, don't respond to one.
"and the more you say, perhaps the more people will listen."
Thats part of the problem though. I hate when people just go on and on just so they can be heard. Say your point and move on is my fashion. I do notice that alot of these prominent people (like professors,Phd's, directors)talk alot and listen less. I hope that is not a quality i have to aquire in order to become successfull. I want to be able to talk my point with the fewest words possible.
true, though for me it's more of talking more in different venues, and therefore exposing your ideas to different people. i agree repeating the same info to the same people becomes monotonous and pointless.
isn't that the point of advertising? repeating your point until people listen and buy your product?
the irony isn't lost me, i know exactly what you're talking about.
At 1:23 am, i would hope you you know what im talking about.
johnny weed, putting the piss & vinegar back into the workermonkey! i love it.
i got to side with neutral here. i've looked into this arguement before. the world hasnt warmed up enough yet to get out of the error range of the computer models. conculsion is inconclusive any fucking way you look at it. i dont care what the data says, its about the error anaylsis that really says anything about the data.
besides, we dont have to worry about shite. in a few years china, india and the rest of the asian countries are going to make the US look like an angel when it comes to pollution.
on another note, computer models are tweaked to shit! trust me i know. example: my model exhibits some 'bad' behavior in certian areas so i simply turn off the parts that make it go bad and turn them back on when i'm in the good area. its justified by physics, its simple and the data looks great! ha ha ha.
Comeon Johnny Weed! Who are you trying to fool- Others or your own common sense? The models are good (although none are perfect i'll admit), but the evidence is staring us in the face. I dont know where you got that info, but the majority of the credible scientific community will tell you that human release of greenhouse gasses has a negative effect on global climate change. We are unaturally pumping billions of tons of CO2 and methane into the atmosphere at an alarming rate. Common sense tells us that this will fuck up the earths natural carbon cycle, therebye having an effect on warming. Who needs stats to make you realize that?